starter.wiki

Security

Audit Logs

Choose an attributable security and administrative event trail by producer model, schema, integrity, tenant access, retention, export, and review.

Recommendation

Choose who must produce and consume the audit trail.

Use an embedded B2B audit service for customer-facing product events, an event-data platform for custom analysis, or an enterprise log suite when audit evidence belongs in a broader security operation.12

For: B2B application, platform, security, and compliance teams designing accountable product audit trails

Main trade-off

A structured audit trail improves accountability and customer evidence while increasing event-schema governance, sensitive-data risk, integrity requirements, storage and retention cost, tenant-access design, export obligations, and review workload.123

Choose the control and ownership model

Start from the threat, protected asset, evidence obligation, or enforcement point before comparing products.

  1. Event contract

    Define actor, action, resource, target, organization, source, time, outcome, reason, context, version, sensitivity, and correlation without copying secrets.12

  2. Integrity and access

    Specify write authority, ordering, clock, immutability expectations, tamper evidence, corrections, tenant isolation, staff access, and break-glass review.12

  3. Retention and export

    Set hot search, archive, deletion, legal or contractual retention, customer export, API access, incident preservation, recovery, and provider exit.13

  4. Review workflow

    Name customer admins, security analysts, auditors, support, alerts, scheduled reviews, investigations, and remediation ownership.12

Decision routes

Each route addresses a bounded security job and retains an explicit verification and failure boundary.

A B2B application needs an embedded organization audit trail

Evaluate WorkOS Audit Logs.

WorkOS Audit Logs is the embedded B2B route when an application wants structured organization-scoped events and a product-facing audit experience.

Verify: Verify event schema, actors, targets, metadata, organization isolation, ingestion, idempotency, export, retention, admin portal, pricing, regions, and provider exit.1

The team owns the audit schema and needs flexible event analysis

Evaluate Axiom.

Axiom is the event-data route when application-defined audit events need ingestion, query, retention, dashboards, monitors, and export in a flexible platform.

Verify: Axiom does not create product audit semantics automatically; the team owns event completeness, attribution, integrity, tenant access, retention, review, and customer UX.2

Audit evidence belongs in an existing enterprise security and observability platform

Evaluate Datadog.

Datadog is the enterprise log-platform route when audit events should share collection, retention, search, detection, access, archive, and investigation operations with an existing Datadog estate.

Verify: The team still owns audit-event semantics, integrity, tenant presentation, sensitive-data controls, index and archive design, rehydration, access, retention, and cost.3

Boundary: Audit Logs prioritize attributable actor, action, resource, outcome, integrity, retention, access, and review evidence; Logging primarily diagnoses systems and operations.

Differences that change the control

Compare enforcement, evidence, operating ownership, failure behavior, sensitive-data exposure, and exit rather than marketing breadth.

Product boundary
An embedded B2B audit product, event-data system, and enterprise log platform provide different semantics and user experiences.12
Integrity and access
Write paths, tenant isolation, staff privileges, deletion, corrections, tamper evidence, and customer access determine accountability.12
Retention and export
Search, archive, rehydration, API, customer export, deletion, recovery, and incident preservation have different cost and control models.13
Review ownership
Recording events is insufficient unless alerts, review, investigation, explanation, and remediation have owners.3

Official resources

Verify current control boundaries, telemetry or evidence handling, deployment, limits, pricing, policy, and operating responsibilities in first-party material.

DocumentationAxiom documentation

Sources

Official documentation supports product boundaries and verification points; the route recommendation remains a bounded editorial judgment.

  1. 1
    WorkOS Audit Logs documentation

    WorkOS · Accessed Official

  2. 2
    Axiom documentation

    Axiom · Accessed Official

  3. 3
    Datadog Log Management documentation

    Datadog · Accessed Official

  4. 4
    NIST Guide to Computer Security Log Management

    NIST · Accessed Official